Beijing’s “zero-COVID” policy has drawn worldwide attention and criticism, particularly as evidence suggests that the virus itself started in China. In this article, NGS intern Barney King looks at the detail of the policy, its impact on travellers, how it compares with other countries in Southeast Asia, and what the future might hold.
Countries across Southeast Asia have imposed a variety of different travel policies to combat the spread of COVID-19. China’s approach has been one of the strictest worldwide and its zero-COVID policy (preventing any spread of the virus whatsoever) has required extensive restrictions. These include mass lockdowns for single COVID-19 cases (Xi’an city put 13 million residents into lockdown in December after the reporting of 143 cases), an intrusive track-and-trace programme, and a 14-day minimum mandatory government quarantine for all arrivals into the country. This has created a significant barrier to entry for all travellers since the beginning of the pandemic.
Entering mainland China is a strict and multistage process. Visas have not been available for tourists or students since March 2020: they are available for foreign nationals for work purposes, although these still require multiple documents. Both PCR and antibody tests are necessary pre-departure. A rigorous testing system then takes place within the 14- to 21-day quarantine period. The costs of this are the responsibility of the traveller and the amount of time in quarantine varies depending on the city and region. For instance, travellers visiting Shenyang can expect a 28-day centralised quarantine followed by a further 28-day quarantine in their homes. Comparatively, Sichuan only requires a 14-day centralised quarantine, followed by seven days of health monitoring (during which travellers are only permitted to undertake essential activities).
These entry requirements have made China inaccessible for a large number of foreign travellers. In addition, travellers can also expect internal restrictions if moving between different regions and cities. Each area is classified as either high, medium or low risk; moving from a high or medium area anywhere requires yet further quarantines. For example, when moving from Shanghai to Chengdu, after a 14-day centralised quarantine, a further seven-day quarantine or seven days of health monitoring is required.
China’s zero-COVID policy has not changed since the pandemic began. It is a widely supported policy throughout the country as COVID-19 cases and deaths have remained exceptionally low. As a result, the travel policy has seen very little adjustment. The minor adjustments that have been made involved re-evaluating those countries from which travellers can travel, following case spikes in several areas of the world. The visa application process has also been streamlined for vaccinated travellers, by reducing the number of documents required, although this has not impacted other elements of the entry process.
The stringency of China’s travel restrictions contrasts sharply with those of other Southeast Asian countries, many of whom have adopted more lenient policies. Initially, the response in this region of the world involved strict lockdowns (Cambodia was even criticised by human rights groups as its citizens could only leave their homes for specific medical reasons during lockdown, and were not allowed to leave to obtain basic necessities such as food). However, these were gradually relaxed over time. Thailand’s ‘test and go’ travel scheme now allows for the free movement of travellers throughout the country after they have quarantined for one day upon arrival and reported a negative PCR test. A second PCR test is then taken on day five of the visit to ensure COVID-19 hasn’t developed. These are extremely limited time delays when compared to Chinas 14- to 21-day quarantine, and entail much lower costs for travellers.
Thailand’s travel scheme was halted for approximately one month due to Omicron, before resuming shortly afterwards. The Thai government is taking a drastically different approach from China because it is under greater pressure to accept travellers, given that 18% of its GDP usually comes from tourism: during 2020 Thailand only received 6.7 million tourists, and this fell further to approximately 106,000 in 2021, which in turn led to tourism only contributing 6% to national GDP.
Other countries in Southeast Asia are also creating new viable options for international travellers to return to the region. Cambodia, the Philippines and Singapore are no longer enforcing mandatory quarantine, while some countries are creating travel bubbles or corridors where reduced restrictions are in place, including Laos and Vietnam. However, an equal amount are still enforcing strict international travel policies: Japan, for example, has suspended all international travel in response to the Omicron variant; South Korea is also still enforcing strict international entry requirements, and all travellers to South Korea are required to complete a 14-day quarantine.
China’s zero-COVID policy has been exceptionally successful in terms of its primary objective of keeping COVID-19 cases to a minimum. Nonetheless, the repercussions of this approach have been severe for international travellers. The strict restrictions have meant that the opportunities to travel to China have become extremely limited, even for Chinese citizens living abroad, and Beijing has demonstrated that it is willing to tolerate continuous international pressure to reopen in order to maintain low infection rates.
China is unlikely to re-open its borders for the foreseeable future. Its healthcare system is not prepared for sudden surges in COVID-19 cases and subsequent high hospitalisation rates. This is due to government efforts to keep infection rates to a minimum, instead of reinforcing the healthcare system, which has left Chinese medical personnel with little experience of controlling the virus. Therefore, China cannot risk relaxing restrictions even though over 3.10 billion vaccine doses have been administered nationally. A sharp rise in cases would also lead to criticism of the government; when cases rapidly rose at the beginning of the pandemic, hospitals were overwhelmed with patients and the initial death toll included many healthcare workers. This generated fierce criticism of the government, which is highly sensitive to negative public sentiment. This is especially the case in 2022, as Xi Jinping prepares for the annual party congress later this year, during which he will attempt to secure his third consecutive term as president.
Author: Barney King, Risk Intern, Northcott Global Solutions
Contact: risk@northcottglobalsolutions.com
DISCLAIMER:
Material supplied by NGS is provided without guarantees, conditions or warranties regarding its accuracy, and may be out of date at any time. Whilst the content NGS produces is published in good faith, it is under no obligation to update information relating to security reports or advice, and there is no representation as to the accuracy, currency, reliability or completeness. NGS cannot make any accurate warnings or guarantees regarding any likely future conditions or incidents. NGS disclaim, to the fullest extent permitted by law, all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on content and services by any user with respect to acts or omissions made by clients on the basis of information contained within. NGS take no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred by users in connection with our material, including loss of income, revenue, business, profits, contracts, savings, data, goodwill, time, or any other loss or damage of any kind.
NGS will now end daily reporting – please contact: risk@northcottglobalsolutions.com to discuss any specific requirements. Update Day 19 Heavy fighting continued in Khartoum yesterday evening, including air strikes and artillery. Fighting was reportedly heaviest around political and military infrastructure. The East Nile hospital has once again been targeted. This morning, small arms fire […]
Internal Conflict On 15 April, tensions between the Rapid Support Forces (RSF – a militia group, led by General Hemetti) and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF – led by the de facto ruler of Sudan, General al-Burhan) escalated into widespread internal conflict. The fighting has spread to several urban centres (including Port Sudan, Merowe, […]
Over the last two weeks, towns in western Kenya have experienced a wave of violent protests that have seen at least three deaths and over 400 injuries. Unrest has been spearheaded by Raila Odinga (leader of the opposition), who was narrowly beaten by President William Ruto in the 2022 general election and has claimed the […]
With South Africa experiencing some of its worst blackouts in recent history, NGS risk analyst Gary Abbott, considers what the ongoing energy crisis means for the security environment and probes the likelihood of a repeat of July 2021, when widespread looting erupted in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng. Introduction The ongoing energy crisis in South […]
International Aviation Concerns On 16 March, Air France’s leading pilots union advised its members that they have the right to refuse to fly into Bamako, after the observation and identification of a Pantsir SA-22, a self-propelled radar-guided Russian surface-to-air missile system capable of attacking targets at a 15km-20km range, near Modibo Keita International Airport. […]
Nigeria is set to head to the polls in an unpredictable presidential election amid a backdrop of heightened insecurity, increasing poverty, and endemic corruption, NGS Risk Analyst, Edward Bach, considers the likely outcome of the election and the wider implications on the security and business environment below: Introduction: Saturday 25 February […]
The Pentagon’s recent release of its annual report on the Chinese military signals an ongoing shift in international politics. It points to a more challenging international environment fraught with risks, where states and companies alike will be exposed to an array of challenges including a greater toleration of human rights abuses and the increased politicisation […]
NGS Russia consultant, Dr Andrew Monaghan, looks at how Moscow views its place in the geopolitical order against the backdrop of the war in Ukraine, and the implications this will have on the Kremlin’s foreign policy strategy, the Russian military, and the national economy over the coming years. […]
Following a year of unprecedented geopolitical developments, forecasting the shape of the world in 2023 is possibly harder than ever. Nonetheless, here NGS Risk Analyst Jason Davies considers the impact of political and security developments throughout 2023 on international relations, and how they will have an impact on international travellers. Risk Scale: […]
With Iran currently gripped by a period of sustained violent protest, NGS risk analyst Edward Bach considers the likelihood of regime change and the global and regional implications of the recent protests and of any new regime in Tehran. Introduction Iran has been gripped by a sustained wave of […]
With China currently experiencing some of the most widespread cases of public unrest in more than 30 years, NGS risk analyst Gary Abbott considers some of the wider implications for both Beijing and the international community. Introduction The recent protests against President Xi’s Zero-Covid strategy in a string of cities across […]