On a new page on the NGS website, the company has published documents considering the changing risks to travellers, looking at how the post-pandemic environment may in some cases change the nature of the threat, and advising how travel managers can put plans in place to ensure the safety and security of their staff.
As vaccination programmes continue across the developed world, international travel is making tentative steps towards normality, at least across some limited routes. In reality, it will be many months, possibly years, before it returns to the same experience it was two years ago, as countries change their reopening schedules on a daily basis. Even once the world has fully reopened to travel, it may never quite be the same – temperature checks and lateral flow tests may become a routine part of any international flight in the coming years. Nonetheless, a lot of business travel has already resumed, particularly between those countries reporting low case numbers or imposing few travel restrictions. As it happens, those countries tend to be the destinations where conventional security risks are more present, from political violence to natural hazards. Subsequently, many corporate travel managers are beginning to plan accordingly for travel in a post-pandemic environment.
New politics: The process of resuming travel is not a straightforward health issue, as new political considerations are paramount. Most countries are experiencing a socio-political division between those who remain wary of the threat from the virus (who want to restrict international travel, which they see as madness in the current environment), and those who are exhausted of the economic toll inflicted by many months of travel restrictions and lockdown (who want everything to reopen in order to kick-start their flagging economies). As a result, national executives, seeking to make quick decisions balancing health and national finances can find themselves hindered by a legislature that reflects these social divisions, and “final” decisions can change frequently.
Shifting requirements: For instance, the US – EU axis is crucial for international travel, and the two sides of the Atlantic will set the tone for global travel resumption. Despite a news conference with Chancellor Merkel in early July, in which President Biden raised hopes that he would be lifting international travel restrictions with Europe “within a few days”, Washington decided to maintain its restrictions amid a rise in infection rates (mostly based on the Delta variant). In particular, the US has instructed its citizens not to travel to the UK amid its growing third wave, despite restrictions being eased for much of the British population on 19 July.
For the EU, most of its latest travel agreements are no longer based on infection rates, but on the spread of new variants that are not yet widespread in the EU. The WHO has maintained its position that proof of vaccination should not be a requirement for international travel – nonetheless, 12 EU countries (including France, Germany, Greece, Italy and Spain) are currently only permitting entry to US travellers if they can prove full vaccination. France only permits one of the four EU-approved vaccines, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and Johnson-and-Johnson: this automatically excludes those Russian and Chinese travellers who may consider themselves protected with Sinovac or Sputnik-V.
Changing threats to travellers: For the international traveller, some considerations will persist regardless of the brand of vaccine used, or the number of days travellers spend in quarantine. These are the permanent threats to traveller security, which need to be considered in advance and managed within the risk capacity and budget of each traveller or organisation. These include kidnap, terrorist attack, crime, natural disasters, other health issues. These can all be mitigated with the correct training and planning. However, the nature of some of these threats has changed in the wake of the pandemic. Most human-based threats have some socio-economic issue at their core, and every country in the world has suffered some level of damage to its economy as a result of essential travel restrictions and lockdowns. These necessary decisions have reduced economic output in all countries, deepening economic divides across societies, thereby increasing the likelihood of crime and civil unrest in some form. For instance, although the recent civil unrest in South Africa was sparked by the trial of Jacob Zuma, it was fuelled by a poorly-performing economy that has been devastated by 18 months of stagnation and rocketing unemployment.
At the same time, countries that suffer from natural disasters will now have a fresh consideration – how to ensure that infection rates are minimised when managing clean-up operations. For instance, heavy rain across India in July has led to flash floods, landslides, blocked highways and deaths across Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra and Sikkim, as well as in residential parts of Mumbai, with dozens of people having been killed. The restoration of services will take months, once the rains have subsided, and this in a country that has experienced one of the worst outbreaks of COVID-19 in the world.
Security travel managers: In the planning stages of international travel, security managers will need to consider how travel risks might have evolved, to verify that their journey management plans are updated to reflect any deterioration in services over the last 18 months, and to put in place a system to ensure that travellers and service providers are all appropriately vaccinated.
NGS can assist all global travellers with tracking, security, emergency evacuation, medical evacuation, training and journey management planning, to ensure that international travel, regardless of the status of vaccinations or nationwide restrictions, can be a productive and enjoyable process for all participants.
These considerations are by no means exhaustive. They can be expanded according to an employer’s own risk appetite, and the advice of in-country security providers. Northcott Global Solutions is an international global assistance company that provides:
– Journey management planning
– Risk management
– Security support (including PPE)
– 24/7 tracking
– Emergency evacuation
– Remote medical support
Peru has been engulfed by violent clashes in recent months between protestors and the pro-government military resulting in the deaths of over 60 civilians. With recent polling suggesting 82% of Peruvians disapprove of the current government’s leadership, NGS Associate Analyst, Harry Sparke, examines the nature and motivations of the protests. Introduction Peru’s young […]
Ecuador has been engulfed by an enduring wave of violent crime which has turned a nation once known as an “island of peace” into one of the most violent countries in Latin America. The label was brought into focus on 09 August, when presidential candidate, Fernando Villavicencio, was assassinated. Ahead of elections on 20 August, […]
The coup in Niger last week was the 13th attempted coup in Africa since 2020, bringing concerns of fresh instability to an already troubled region. Here, NGS Risk Analyst Jason Davies considers what the international reaction to the coup will mean for international travellers to Niger, and suggests some security measures. Introduction On […]
Far-right political parties in Europe, particularly (but not exclusively) Germany, Spain and Italy, have increased their national vote share in recent years, demonstrating a resurgence in popularity that few would have predicted 20 years ago. In his latest article, NGS Risk Analyst Jason Davies considers the impact this renewed polarisation of national politics could have […]
After nearly two weeks in which some of South Africa’s main highways have experienced violent arson attacks on domestic trucking, NGS Risk Analyst Edward Bach looks at what might be provoking the violence, and the security implications. Introduction Since the evening of 08 July, South Africa has been gripped by a wave of […]
With the Captagon trade becoming an increasingly vital tool for Assad, the Risk team’s latest article considers the geostrategic impact of the trade on the region and beyond. Introduction The Syrian Civil War, now in a ceasefire since 2020, is ongoing in a minor capacity with scattered and intermittent clashes still taking place. […]
In the early hours of Monday, Israeli forces entered the refugee camp in the Palestinian city of Jenin, which they claim is home to multiple militant groups including, Hamas, Fatah and Islamic Jihad. The incursion has resulted in more than 100 casualties, causing a mass exodus from the camp of some 3000 refugees. The city […]
The NGS Risk team produces a weekly situation report on the conflict in Ukraine. This week, NGS Risk Analyst Edward Bach also looks at the events in Russia over the weekend, and considers the implications that the Wagner Group’s actions may have on the Ukraine war. Military In contrast to the previously […]
Between 01 and 04 June Senegal was rocked by its deadliest wave of unrest in years in response to opposition leader Ousmane Sonko being handed a two-year prison sentence for a charge opposition activists claim is fabricated for political means. The ensuing protests have seen at least 23 people die, over 400 sustain injuries, and […]
With the Sudan conflict passing its one-month mark on the 15 May, NGS Risk Analyst, Gary Abbott, considers what the conflict means for the wider region, exploring how it could exacerbate underlying grievances and lead to increased insecurity in several countries in the Horn of Africa and those further afield. Introduction 15 May […]
The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has caused many well-publicised ructions in Europe and the West. However, what is little reported are the political and security issues that have impacted on the Central Asian states of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Here, NGS associate analyst James Bulbeck considers the political forecast for […]
On 14 May, Turkey will hold its most significant election in recent times, when, for the first time since his election in 2014, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan faces a realistic prospect of defeat. The presidential election will run concurrently with parliamentary elections. In 2017, a constitutional referendum approved reforms which replaced the existing parliamentary system with […]